Skip to main content
false equivalence

false equivalence

2 8.6
A claim that treats two very different things as the same
  • noun
  • /fɔls ɪˈkwɪvələns/
  • Literature
translation icon : falsa equivalencia
  • Your argument is predicated upon a false equivalence that the two groups have an inherently equal standing.

Examples

  • Secondly, there's a note of false equivalence.

    Blog text (13)
  • The term "false equivalence" fits here.

    Blog text (8)
  • To make that association is to create a false equivalence.

    Blog text (22)
  • You are presenting a false equivalence.

    Blog text (1)
  • That's a false equivalence and you know it.

  • But I disagree with your gesture toward false equivalence at the end of this column.

    Blog text (18)
  • And correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there's a false equivalence here.

    Blog text (33)
  • Your argument is one of false equivalence, at least over the last 100 or so odd years, and demonstrably in our present.

    Blog text (1)
  • Hierarchies ≠ bureaucracies, so you're starting with a false equivalence.

    Blog text (33)
  • The politician's statement was criticized for presenting a false equivalence between the two completely different policies.

Surface Forms

Morphology

false + equivalence

The meaning is directly compositional: 'false' (incorrect) qualifies 'equivalence' (sameness/value), yielding 'an equivalence that is not true' which a B1 learner who knows both words can infer. The adjective+noun formation follows a regular English pattern and the logic is cross-linguistically common, so the expression is transparent.

Etymology

False equivalence uses the words false and equivalence to paint a picture of a balance scale that wrongly shows two very different things as equal, like saying apples and oranges are the same. So it means a 'misleading' comparison that treats things as 'equivalent' when they are not.