concurrent negligence
- noun
- /kənˈkʌrənt ˈnɛɡlɪdʒəns/
- Formal
- In cases of concurrent negligence, a plaintiff can choose to sue either one or both responsible parties.
Examples
-
The court found that both drivers were guilty of concurrent negligence in causing the accident.
-
Legal experts discussed how concurrent negligence affects the allocation of damages in civil lawsuits.
-
The case involved concurrent negligence from both drivers.
-
Can you explain concurrent negligence in this context?
-
In cases of concurrent negligence, a plaintiff can choose to sue either one or both responsible parties.
-
The court found that both drivers were guilty of concurrent negligence in causing the accident.
-
Legal experts discussed how concurrent negligence affects the allocation of damages in civil lawsuits.
Surface Forms
Morphology
The noun phrase is largely compositional: 'concurrent' (existing/happening at the same time) plus 'negligence' (failure causing harm) lets a learner infer a type of negligence that occurs together or simultaneously. However, the specific legal nuance — that it often involves independent parties each contributing to the same harm and the procedural implications (e.g. suing any or all parties) — is specialized and not fully predictable from the words alone, so it is only partially transparent to a B1 learner.
Etymology
The legal term concurrent negligence uses concurrent for 'happening together' and negligence for 'careless' to picture two careless acts that both cause the same injury. That's why the person who is hurt can choose to 'sue' one or both people.